Traditional research evaluation relied heavily on journal‑level metrics. Open science is shifting focus toward transparency, quality, and societal impact.
Limitations of Traditional Evaluation
Traditional systems:
Overemphasize impact factors
Undervalue openness
Emerging Evaluation Models
New approaches consider:
Data sharing
Reproducibility
Public engagement
Implications for Researchers
Researchers must:
Document open practices
Demonstrate diverse impacts
Conclusion
Open science is redefining research evaluation by promoting fairer, more holistic assessment.