Research Misconduct vs Questionable Research Practices Explained

Digital Archives and Their Importance in Academic Research

Research Misconduct vs Questionable Research Practices Explained

Reading time - 7 minutes

Introduction

Not all problematic research behavior qualifies as misconduct. Distinguishing between research misconduct and questionable research practices (QRPs) is essential for fair investigation and prevention.

This article explains the differences, examples, and implications for researchers and institutions.

What Is Research Misconduct?

Research misconduct typically includes:

  • Fabrication
  • Falsification
  • Plagiarism

These are serious violations with severe consequences.

What Are Questionable Research Practices?

QRPs may include:

  • Selective reporting
  • Poor documentation
  • Inadequate supervision

They undermine research quality but are not always intentional.

Why the Distinction Matters

Clear distinctions:

  • Ensure proportional responses
  • Support education over punishment
  • Improve research culture

Preventing Misconduct and QRPs

Prevention strategies include:

  • Training
  • Mentorship
  • Transparent workflows

Conclusion

Understanding the difference between misconduct and questionable practices supports fair evaluation and healthier research environments.