Long peer review delays frustrate authors, especially under career or funding pressure. Understanding how to manage delays professionally preserves relationships and options.
Why Peer Review Takes Time
Common reasons include:
Reviewer availability
Complex manuscripts
Multiple review rounds
When to Follow Up
Appropriate follow‑up timing:
After stated review period
Using polite, concise messages
How to Communicate with Editors
Effective communication is:
Professional
Respectful
Non‑accusatory
Conclusion
Patience combined with professional communication is the best strategy for navigating review delays.