How to Respond to Conflicting Peer Reviewer Comments / Blog How to Respond to Conflicting Peer Reviewer Comments Reading time - 7 minutes IntroductionConflicting reviewer comments are common and can confuse even experienced authors. Learning how to navigate contradictions is a key academic skill.Why Reviewer Conflicts OccurReasons include:Different theoretical perspectivesMethodological preferencesDisciplinary normsHow Editors Expect Authors to RespondEditors want:Clear explanationsBalanced responsesEvidence‑based decisionsStep‑by‑Step Response StrategyIdentify conflictsExplain chosen approachJustify with evidenceCommunicate clearly to editorConclusionConflicting reviews are not a barrier to acceptance when handled thoughtfully. Clear, respectful responses help editors make informed decisions. Related Posts:How to Handle Peer Reviewer Comments Effectively in Academic…Editorial Conflicts of Interest in Academic Publishing: Risks,…Effective Literature Review Writing for Academic PapersHow to Respond to Journal Editorial DecisionsOpen Peer Review: A Transparent Future?